Some History of the 'United States'

Corporate America

The United States of America's Congress formed a private corporation named, "The District of Columbia" (Corp. USA) in, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 § 41.  The purpose of this corporation was to carry out the business needs of the government under the martial law aftermath of the Civil War.  The corporation that was created trademarked the names: "United States Government", "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "USA", and "America". The corporation was not well received by the people and by the end of 1873, it was nearly defunct.

So, in 1878, the corporation was reorganized along with its trademarks. The 'United States' (which I have named the 'United States Inc') began issuing bonds to cover the expenses of running a government. They continued to issue these bonds until 1912 when it became apparent that there were more bonds due than there was money in the Treasury to pay for said bonds.

During the 24 years in which the bonds were issued, most of them were bought by seven very powerful European families and in 1912 they demanded their timely redemption. When the United States Inc couldn't come up with the money, they were still obligated to pay in some form or fashion. The Treasury of the United States of America obviously did not have sufficient funds to cover the bonds. So to satisfy the obligations, the seven families legally seized the Treasury with all of its possessions.

By 1913, there was still no money for operating both the government or the corporation. If the United States Inc didn't do something, and fast, the people would revolt against them. So, the United States Inc approached the seven powerful, rich, and influential families asking if they could borrow money from them.

The Federal Reserve Bank

The heads of those families made arrangements and provisions to loan the money to the United States Inc and in 1913, the newly created private, for-profit, non-auditable, independent, non-federal, Federal Reserve Bank was formed with an agreement to fund The United States Incorporated in their endeavors. Such an action would have been a major violation of law if it involved the actual government of the United States of America, but it wasn't the government of the United States of America involved in this transaction, it was a corporation, the United States Inc. And it's not a problem or illegal for a corporation called the 'United States' to contract with another corporation called the Federal Reserve Bank.

The real problem lies in the choice of the name that is used for both institutions. They are the same for both the government and the corporation! So, how does one discern the difference between the corporation named, "THE UNITED STATES", and the government of the United States of America? To make matters worse, how does one discern the difference between the corporate 'United States' [which is actually a corporate Trust and the body of government that represents the Trust, a.k.a. the Trustees], AND how does one discern when one name is being used versus the other when both names are either the same or similar?  The answer is simple, by design, you can't, you don't, and you won't, unless you know the context of what is being said or done. (By the way, this same duplicity occurs on an individual basis with the citizens of this country who each have two names. The lower case and the upper case names. That is, the real live you and the ens legis, corporate, legal fiction, capitalized YOU).

The problem gets even larger when you take into consideration the fact that the officers of government are also the officers of the corporation. They were simultaneously elected and appointed to their offices, both in the government and in the corporation at the same time. In virtually every way, the names of their offices as well as their responsibilities (as both government officers and as corporate officials) were similar or exactly the same.

There was no conflict in interest because the corporations purpose was to fulfill the business needs of the government. Without going into all the details and ramifications of the arrangements between the United States Inc and the Federal Reserve Bank, this fact remains: Where the government couldn't lawfully be involved with the Federal Reserve Bank, the corporation could be and is to this day, the day you are reading this.

Having recognized the Federal Reserve link with the United States Inc, let's jump forward through history. For the purposes of this article, we're going to jump right over the Trading with Enemies Act of 1917 and the Emergency War Powers Act of 1933. Though those Acts are very important for so many reasons, they don't affect the outcome of this portion of the presentation of history, as we want to stick with the money and Corporate America.

There will be a separate section on what happened during 1933. It's not very pretty.

The UN, IMF, & World Bank

So we jump from 1913 and the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank as the financier of the United States Government to 1944 and WW2. The war was winding down and a new player entered the scene - The United Nations and its creations "The International Monetary Fund" (IMF), and "The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development" (a.k.a. World Bank).

We turn now to Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 286 (22 USC § 286) and its title: Acceptance of Membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund. "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the 'United States' into the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited [hidden] in the archives of the Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch. 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.)

Short titles: May be cited as the 'Bretton Woods Agreement Act'. "Other provisions: Par value modification. For the Congressional direction that the Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in terms of gold of the Inter-American Development Bank's holdings of United States dollars following the establishment of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce of gold pursuant to the Par Value Modification Act and for the authorization of the appropriations necessary to provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC § 449a."

Commentary: the above code states that the 'United States' is part of both the IMF and of the World Bank. In other words, the IMF and the World Bank own the 'United States Inc'. The IMF and the World Bank are creations of the United Nations (UN). In essence, the UN owns the 'United States Inc'. Some members of Congress know of this, some lawyers know this and the top players of the major networks know of this, but none of this information filters to the public.

The QuitClaim Deed

The above US Code further transferred the assets of the 'United States' Treasury to the IMF by using language to the effect that: 'the United States Treasury is now the Individual Drawing account of the IMF'

Commentary: Let's give this some thought: "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States into the IMF" The President is authorized by whom? Congress? Even if Congress did authorize it, where did they get the authority to do so? Certainly not from the Constitution. So, how could Congress lawfully authorize that which they are not authorized to do? 

Joining the IMF is obviously an international agreement; and, any good dictionary will define, "an agreement between nations" as a "Treaty".  The Constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with respect to this nation: first, the President signs the treaty and; second, the Senate ratifies the President's signature with a two-thirds majority vote. That didn't happen here. So, if the right was not bequeathed by the Constitution and a Senate vote was not taken, then ratification never occurred and therefore Congress cannot condone the actions of the President as described above.

Further, this act states that Authorization came from the UN instead of from Congress, "provided for as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations." But, there was no treaty with the UN until December 20, 1945, which was five months after the above-described event. So the UN could not exercise its treaty with the United States.

So obviously, something is either askew or we are missing something because the aforementioned does not add up or make sense. There has to be a logical explanation for Section 286 of Title 22 of the US Code.

'When you examine the solutions and you discover what cannot be, the solution can only be whatever is left.'  

~ Spock from Star Trek 

We know that The United States of America cannot be a member in the IMF, and the Treasury of the United States of America cannot be turned over to a foreign bank's control. The only possible explanation here is that the entire Title noted above involves The United States Inc which is but a corporation. There is nothing that says a corporation cannot QuitClaim deed itself to another owner. And in this case, that is exactly what happened.

In 22 USC § 286, where it says, "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States," the 'United States,' as used here, can only be the trademark name for the corporation known as, "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT." In other words, the corporation formed in 1878, not the government, is what became part of the IMF, World Bank, and the UN. Regardless, the corporate United States and the government of the United States are, in essence, one and the same. Thus, even though officially the US Inc became a subsidiary of the IMF which is part of the UN, the United States of America government became, unofficially, a subsidiary of the IMF and thus part of the UN.

To further substantiate this assessment, in the "Other provisions" section of the Title, it makes mention of "the Secretary of Treasury," which is but an officer of the corporation as that position does not exist in the national government. The equivalent position in the national government is, "the Treasurer of the United States of America." This is why all of the United States currencies ($1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100) have two Treasury signatures on them. One is a signature of the Secretary of Treasury of the corporation and one is a signature of the Treasurer of the United States of America, the government.

As a matter of fact, when you review the entire document, 22 USC § 286, and the underlying "Bretton Woods Agreement," you'll find the following elements....

1. Congress of the United States of America passes the Bretton Woods Agreement and statutizes a portion of it as 22 USC § 286.

2. In the agreement, Congress grants to the IMF the "United States Treasury" as, "the individual drawing account" for the IMF.

3. "The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a governor of the Fund who shall serve as a governor of the Bank" 22 USC § 286a.

The person the President chose as Governor of the Bank and of the IMF was the Secretary of the Treasury which is a corporate position and title not a government position or title. 

The elements of a QuitClaim Deed are: there must be a Grantor, a Grantee, and assets or rights granted. In this case, we have a Corporation known as, "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", with trademark names such as: United States, US, USA, America, U.S., U.S.A. etc. Its assets are its Treasury (The United States Treasury), and its purpose is to carry out the business needs of the national government of The United States of America. The directors of said Corporation were also the Representatives and Senators of the United States of America, the nation. But, now it's The Federal Reserve Bank and the UN.

The Treasury (of the corporation) was granted by the Grantor which is the government of the United States of America (Congress and the President), to the Grantee which is the IMF and the Word Bank. Therefore 22 USC § 286 is a QuitClaim Deed of the Corporation known as, "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT", from The United States of America to the IMF/World Bank which is owned and controlled by the United Nations.

The States join Corporate America

This started around 1962 and continued through 1968. The United States Inc. went to the States and pointed out to them that their own Constitutions forbade them from participating in foreign currencies and/or loans, bonds, etc., and yet they were conducting transactions with foreign currency via use of Federal Reserve Notes (the U.S. Dollar). The thinking back then was that if the people in this country suddenly woke up and became aware of this fact, then a situation similar to that of the Magna Carta signing where the people held a sword to the King's head and said "sign or we'll get a new king" might happen. The king signed. So did the States. 

But, the States needn't have worried about incorporating as the people in this country (as of 2024) have still not awakened to what has gone on behind their backs, and even if the people do read these pages or a similar website, they won't believe it and they won't act upon it, and most likely won't understand the ramifications of what they have just read on this page.

Nonetheless, one by one, the States signed their Corporations over as sub-corporations to The United States Inc.   Colorado rewrote Colorado's Constitution, revised the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS), and enacted CRS Title 24 as the "Administrative Organization Act of 1968," thereby restructuring its laws in that year. Title 24 became the new corporate charter for, "THE STATE OF COLORADO" which is a United States sub-corporation of the United States Inc. (in other words, a possession).

By 1968, all of the individual States had done the same thing. The California Republic became "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA". The Texas Republic became "THE STATE OF TEXAS". The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania became "THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA". Each and every state changed the name of their state to "THE STATE OF _____________" by 1968.